28 Feb 2011

The year 2000 as imagined by the French in 1910. It's charming, but it looks like they got very little right! That retronaut website is interesting, by the way. Check out Hitler's Stealth Bomber and Anne Frank, Then and Now. "Back to Their Future" is a photographic trick I tried before: 1958/1985 and 1968/1998.

My talented son has a college assignment to re-label a product; here's his reimagining of Jones Soda. When my kids were little I'd sometimes take a product off the grocery store shelves and ask, "Good design or bad design?" It was my way of getting them to think about art, advertising and design. I think this qualifies as "good design." I hope he gets a good grade on it...

I think about design a lot, and in the oddest places. For instance, the Zurn logo (the company makes valves and other plumbing items) is familiar to any male standing at a urinal in a public men's room. But it reminds me of the Burger King logo. I don't want to associate food with where I'm at when I see the Zurn logo.

I saw a wonderful documentary over the weekend, Man on Wire (2008 - the odd phrase comes from the NYPD citation), about the French aerialist Phillippe Petit, who furtively strung a cable between the two World Trade Center buildings in August 1974 and walked between them, astonishing the world. His team called it le coup, which is indeed what it was. The documentary was fun and caused me to reflect upon the French nation and all she has given to Western civilization.

I suppose there are other nationalities who could have and would have done such a thing, but to me, the act of stringing up a line between the two tallest towers in the world and walking - actually, dancing - upon them seems quintessentially French. Somebody had to do it. (Really? Was this necessary? Yes, it was. August 1974 was a troubled month. Petit pulled off his coup on the 7th - Richard Nixon resigned the presidency on the 8th. While the resignation was what dominated the press and there was no connection between the two events, Petit's coup was a light-hearted but typically French way of saying life goes on and people will still do amazing things - do not become disheartened.)

I think an Franco-American rapprochement (the French always seem to have the right word for it, don't they?) is long overdue. When the Gulf War began and it became obvious the French were not going to take part as we would have wished, a wave of anti-French feeling washed over us. The faux patriotic demanded that we rename French fries "Freedom Fries." (The French themselves call them pommes frites, a prettier name.) I never went along with this nonsense.

General Schwarzkopf, the allied commander, rather ungallantly said, "Going into battle without the French is like going into battle without your accordion player." Perhaps. They haven't exactly distinguished themselves militarily since World War I, when they were fought down to nearly the extinguishing of an entire generation (an important consideration). But this misses the point. To quote my favorite lecturer Robert Greenberg, France has been, is, and always will be a cultural powerhouse. The French have led the way in civilizing the West, and it is their traditional role to show the rest of the world what is good and desirable in the arts, fashion and culture. Socrates said that the unexamined life isn't worth living. The French excel at this examination.

There is no bigger Anglophile than I. I can name all of the Plantagenet kings and give a fair account of much of Great Britain's military history. That being said, you would expect that I would harbor dismissive feelings about England's traditional enemy and rival, France. But I do not. (Full disclosure: I am half-French, via French Canada, on my mother's side.) I think that even the most rabid Francophobe would have to feel somewhat guilty, I think, at slagging off the considerable accomplishments of the French in world civilization.

There is no language more beautiful to the ear than French. Italian could arguably be a close second, but French is properly called the language of love.

Nobody but nobody cooks like the French. The phrase "French chef" or "French cuisine" means the best there is.

There is a compelling reason why haute couture is a French phrase. Try as New York, London, Vienna or other nations can, they cannot dislodge the French from their commanding position in fashion.

I am convinced that there is no more mystical art/science than that of perfumery. Scientists can't even predictively describe the mechanism by which compounds give off smells. Who dominates the world in this arcane science? The French. Once again, the phrase "French perfume" describes the best there is.

Paris - The City of Light - has called the cultural and artistic shots in Europe for centuries. And I am not overstating things when I assert that Paris is one of the glories of Western civilization.


French composers like Debussy and Ravel looked at the world of classical music dominated by the frequently bombastic sounds of Richard Wagner and gave us French impressionism, which was totally new, infinitely more subtle and even mysterious. Astonishing, even - but that's what the French do, they astonish us. Once again, somebody has to.

And let us not forget that George Washington was very, very happy and grateful to have the assistance of the French at a critical juncture in American history. I need only mention the names De Grasse, Rochambeau and Lafayette - could we have won our War of Independence without them? And if you seek to fully describe enduring American national characteristics, you need to turn to the writings of Alexis de Tocqueville, a very perceptive Frenchman.

..and that's another thing the French do for us, they point out what is best in American arts. Were it not for 19th C. French critics, Edgar Allen Poe would not have the secure place in American letters he enjoys today - it was the French who caused us to recognize his novelty and genius. (Don't ask me about their love for Jerry Lewis films. I haven't figured that one out.) The same goes for my favorite American artistic invention, film noir. It was French film critics who pointed out to us that, after 1944 or so, a darker and more cynical tone had been substituted for the usual cheery productions Hollywood had been cranking out since the Depression.

Perhaps what I like best about the French is their enterprising nature. They are not just content to develop the considerable arts, fashion and culture within their own sphere - they look outside of themselves to other nations, as I have described above. Who brought, say, Brazilian bossa nova to the attention of the world? The French, via Michael Camus' 1959 film Black Orpheus. Who brought Russian music and ballet to the world? Paris, via the Ballets Russe. When black dancer, singer and actress Josephine Baker, tired of American racism, fled to Paris she was warmly received and celebrated.

But I am waxing overlong in this blog entry - and what's more, I am defending that which is patently obvious and does not need to be defended. It is sad to me that, among my politically conservative friends, the French need to be defended, as if there is some kind of virtue in emphasising the traditional Special Relationship between the U.S. and Great Britain (and other Anglophone nations) at the expense of France. France is still a friend to America; deep down they still respect and admire us. Indeed, it is not the French merely being the French and occasionally disagreeing with American foreign policy that disturbs me - it is the thought of the French culture being subsumed by a growing Islamic culture and ceasing to become traditionally French that bothers me more. For instance, I miss devout French Catholicism; I think the world is a shabbier place without it.

I shall close by stating that not only do the French still matter, but that we need them more than we think. Indeed, a more relevant question than, "Do the French still matter?" might be, "Does California still matter?" (Which is painful to me since it's my native state.)


25 Feb 2011

The Big R is Retirement, and that's what I've been looking at as of late. I'm too young to retire anytime soon, but I have arrived at a tentative date: 27 August 2022 - just over eleven years hence. It's the date I'll be 66 years and 4 months old, which is the (current) full retirement age for Social Security. I'm a Federal employee and could retire earlier, but at a cost; I wouldn't get as much money.

Like Caesar's Gaul, my retirement comes in three parts: what is called a "FERS Annuity" (which is the pension I'd get as a Federal employee), Social Security (which is what everybody gets, assuming it'll still be around when the Red Chinese call in our national debt, in which case the new bosses may well say to me "No tickee! No tickee!") and the Thrift Savings Plan, which is something I've been contributing to since 1993. Of course, with the present All Federal Employees Suck sentiment that is making the rounds, Congress could elect to cut or make less favorable any part of this. But I remember what a retirement counselor once said to me: "If you're worried about your retirement system, don't be. The Members of Congress also rely upon it."

There's a fourth thing: When I was laid off from E-Systems Melpar Division back in 1993 my four years and four months there were vested. This results in about a $200 check every month starting at age 65; barring a financial retirement pension meltdown of some kind, I will collect. By 2021 that amount may just buy a lunch, but I will collect. Lay me off, huh? You'll pay. (Smiley face.) Every few years I mail a letter to Raytheon - the purchasers of E-Systems - just to make sure I have it in writing and nobody says "Payment? What payment?"

I have never before done any calculations for retirement - which makes me a fool, I know. It's clearly time to start. What is nice, however, is that now I have a date in mind. It's liberating. No matter what kind of a crappy day at work I've had, I can reflect that there is only 4,201 of them left before I retire. And while 4,201 seems like a big number, it really isn't. I think back to eleven years ago: February 2000. I went to the pub at the British Embassy and watched the England-Scotland rugby match. It doesn't seem that long ago! Tempus fugit.

My recent planning and speculation doesn't stop at retirement, but at my death. How long will I live to collect retirement? My father died two days before his 71st birthday, my mother was 74. But I live a less stressed, healthier lifestyle than they did, and health care now is much better - and I'm far better than they about annual checkups, etc. The average life expectancy for a male my age (based on a U.S. Government Health and Human Services chart) is 77.7. But I've read that life expectancy for Mormon males is somewhat better than for non-Mormon males for various reasons: non-smoking, non-drinking, emphasis on family and friends, hobbies, being a part in a social scene, running a Webelos den (again, smiley face), etc., in general a healthier lifestyle. So I figure I'll snuff it when I'm about 80. That gives me about 14 years of retirement.

What will I do? The question is, what won't I do? Reenacting in pleasant weather is still viable; I knew two guys in their eighties who were still active. I haven't entirely ruled out rugby, but it's not likely I'll play (third and final smiley face). My religion has all sorts of things for older folks to do. I can work in a temple, I can go on a couple's mission with my wife (in fact we want to do this someday) - all sorts of volunteer work. Helping people discover lost family members via the genealogical libraries...

I recall one fellow - somewhat older than me - talking about aging: "When you stop, you drop." I do not plan to do what my father did - age by sitting in a chair in front of a television. His comment was, "Growing old? It's sitting in your chair to watch TV and missing the last half of the show because you fell asleep." YIKES.

(By the way, my summary of a rugby practice session from eleven years ago makes for interesting reading, if I do say so myself: "We did various tackling, passing, rucking and mauling drills. One of them was essentially a big wrestling match within cones, and I got knocked hard on the forehead, and have a discoloration and a swelling as a reward. This will cause some disbelieving stares at work. Then we did a half-pitch practice game, and I took some one's studs in the mouth. The mouth guard protected my teeth, however, so all is well. I made my first try! Too bad it was only practice... I pulled the ball out of a mess nearly on the try line and flung myself forward. Still, this was a brutal practice, as far as practices go. First of all, it was long - we started at 10 and ended around 1 - and secondly, it was rather bloody. I actually saw gobbets of blood on the pitch here and there, something we only infrequently managed in reenacting using edged weapons. At one point I looked at my hands and saw some one's blood on them, no way of telling whose. Maybe my own. So when you read "Give Blood - Play Rugby" it's no exaggeration." Photo.)

Speaking of violence, I watched an intriguing German film last night, The White Ribbon (2009). It's about a series of brutal pranks played upon a German village before World War I, and of the general sense of malaise that settles upon the place as a result. It was rather hard to watch: the adults are generally stern, unlikable and even perverted, and the children sullen and, I think, malevolent. (Check out the expression on this kid's puss.) The grim black and white photography reminded me of a Sven Nykvist-shot Ingmar Bergman film. It was a bit like a German version of The Children of the Damned - Das Kinder von der Dammt. (Last smiley - I promise.)

I initially didn't like it because the story is unresolved - you never find out who pulled the pranks. (The circumstantial evidence points strongly to the village children.) That's always irritating, especially after two and a half hours - you expect a payoff. But as I began to think about the film I began to like it. Is the director suggesting that this is how Nazism and the worldwide suffering of the wars began (the village boys might later become brown shirts), or is he raising questions about innocence - symbolized by the white ribbons two children are forced to wear by their father, a priest - and terrorism? It's endlessly debatable.

I suppose there is also the usual secular humanist worldview that children raised in religious surroundings may be repressed, unhealthy and turn evil... yeah, yeah, yeah. My ten years in scouting in church programs convinces me otherwise. From wikipedia: "Ann Hornaday of the Washington Post wrote that trying to locate the seeds of fascism in religious hypocrisy and authoritarianism is 'a simplistic notion, disturbing not in its surprise or profundity, but in the sadistic trouble the filmmaker has taken to advance it.'" Wow. Somebody writing for the Post agrees with me? Will wonders never cease?

Another weekend looms. My wife is going to a local bridal show on Saturday, and then the Five Families will don their ceremonial robes and convene to a restaurant somewhere in Northern Virginia. I will continue digitizing my Lp collection. (I just finished my three Klaatu Lps - man, that band was well-produced. Even Capitol Records, with their usual crappy vinyl pressing techniques - couldn't screw up their sound.)

Have a great weekend!


24 Feb 2011

In my church we Mormons accept the following as scripture: "We have learned by sad experience that it is the nature and disposition of almost all men, as soon as they get a little authority, as they suppose, they will immediately begin to exercise unrighteous dominion." (Doctrines and Covenants 121:39). This pessimistic commentary on humanity is what's primarily behind an interesting film I saw last night, Das Experiment (2001), a German work about an academic experiment where twenty men are made guards and prisoners and monitored to see how they adopt their roles.

It is based, more or less, upon a real life experiment held in 1971 which was abandoned after six days due to brutality on the part of the "guards." (Read the wikipedia article provided by the link. It is not a comforting treatise about humanity.) It was a very thought-provoking film despite the fact that I initially thought one of the plot devices would be, "Who are the prisoners and who are the wardens?", which is what makes the 1967 British television show The Prisoner so fascinating. (There are also interesting themes of the individual vs. society, and the nature of prisons and free society.)

It also caused me to remember something I once heard on the radio, that prison guards usually scored higher on aggression tests than do prisoners.

As I watched this film I asked myself, How would I behave? I would like to think that I'd take my cues from one of my personal fictional heroes, #6 (Patrick McGoohan) of the Prisoner: "I am not a number. I am a person. I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, filed, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own." Certainly I have a strong personality, do not accept the role of victim and am not easily moved by peer pressure (as I learned in Marine Corps boot camp). But these are extreme situations - who's to tell?

I found it interesting that none of the "prisoners" attempted to assert their personalities over their guards. Why not? I think I would. After all, this is an academic exercise, not the real thing. I kept wondering why one of the prisoners didn't say something to the guards like, "You are a guard now. In a week you won't be. Perhaps then we will chat. Time is on my side, not yours." One of my favorite episodes of the Prisoner is called Hammer into Anvil (from a quote by Goethe: "You must be hammer or anvil") where #6 does something like this and ruins one of the wardens by exerting mental dominance over him.

Anyway, excellent film. And, being German, it has special interest. Indeed, one blue-eyed fellow comes off as very much the sadistic concentration camp warden type, and another shouts something about Nazis as he's hurled into his cell. German National Socialism and the Final Solution is the unstated subtext to works like this, I guess.

(I mentioned USMC boot camp; I learned something valuable about myself as an eighteen year-old. At one point, one of our drill instructors said he was disgusted by our poor performance and had decided to leave. All of the members of my platoon petitioned him to stay. That is, all did in a platoon of about seventy, except for two - me and another recruit. I had realized that this was merely theatre on the part of the drill instructor and refused to go along with it and told everyone so. The other recruit stayed silent but aloof. It wasn't a big deal except that in the setting of a recruit platoon, where everyone is coerced to be a team, there was pressure and I didn't relent. I was satisfied with myself in the realization that I didn't bend easily to peer pressure.)

Last night I also watched a excellent, absolutely top notch BBC documentary about gladiators and the great Colosseum in Rome, Colosseum: A Gladiator's Story (2004), which deals with the real-life experiences of Verus, a slave turned gladiator turned free man. Cari came into the room while I was watching it and said, "This looks gay." Yeah... it did, kind of. But it is historical, factual and highly recommended for history buffs.

Did you know an English Civil War (1642-1651) battle was fought in Maryland? I didn't until yesterday, when my friend Don told me about the Battle of the Severn. As battles go, it was no, say, Gettysburg (total combatants: about 300 - that's a skirmish in my book), but it has been called the last battle of the English Civil War. Interesting!

I gave up on Joseph Heller's Catch-22. I was put off by the New York Times mindset and general anti-military snarkiness. I was raised on M.A.S.H. episodes and got more than enough of that kind of thing in the Seventies. So I will instead rely upon a helpful wikipedia link to explain the meaning of the popular term "catch-22." There. Now I know. Onto other works...

...which currently is Knight - The Medieval Warrior's Unofficial Manual by Michael Prestwich, a library book. It's a clever little volume, assuming that you live in the mid-fifteenth century and wish to become a knight. It explains the training, the code of chivalry, the various orders, manners and behavior, etc. I've never seen this approach to the subject before, so it gets high marks for originality. I have a friend who woudl like this book. I'll recommend it.

Finally, I note that thanks to Michael F. Keaney, writer of film noir encyclopedias, I have now seen every noir cited in Silver and Ward's encyclopedia save ten (out of about 300). And five of those ten were made before 1940 and are more pre-noir than really film noir. Most critics agree that the genre began with either Stranger on the Third Floor (1940) or The Maltese Falcon (1941). I've seen them both and vote for the earlier film. Anyway, it's an achievement of sorts. Thanks, Michael!

Tomorrow I discuss The Big R.


23 Feb 2011

I'm reading a big coffee table book about battles that have changed history. One of the battles is the Battle of Lake Peipus (1242) between Alexander Nevsky's Novgorodian army and the Livonian Teutonic Knights, the so-called "Battle on the Ice." It's the subject of a famous film by Sergei Eisenstein, Alexander Nevsky (1938) with which I am very familiar. (I have liked the Prokofiev score ever since I was a teen.)

The film was made as propaganda to the Germans, the message being, "Invade us and you will lose." Hitler being Hitler ignored this - and his armies suffered greatly on the retreat back to Germany - just as Napoleon did over a hundred years before. History teaches that a military occupation of a nation as large as Russia is folly. A military campaign in Russia during the winter is guaranteed failure.

There were a number of interesting facts in the book I didn't know, and one wouldn't know if one learned about the battle via the movie:

1.) Alexander Nevsky's army was not primarily made up of earnest, down-to-earth, hard-singing peasants spouting socialistic sentiments. It was a professional army.
2.) Very few knights, clad in heavy armor, likely dramatically cracked through a sheet of ice on the lake and drowned, as seen in the film. Lake Peipus is very shallow.
3.) It wasn't a big deal. There were perhaps 4,000 troops on each side; only about 400 Teutonic knights were killed. Nevertheless, the primary importance of the battle was that it ended Catholic crusades into Orthodox Russia - and that it was reused nearly 700 years later as propaganda.

I am now reading Joseph Heller's Catch-22. After hearing the title used as a metaphor for a no win situation all my life I'm interested in reading the source material.

Last night I watched a truly daft movie, an insane film about insane deeds. The film was Werner Herzog's celebrated 1982 Fitzcarraldo, the story of a man who wants to bring Caruso, and an opera house, to the jungles of South America. In order to do this he needs money, so he buys a large steamship, which must be dragged across a mountain top (this is the film's famous set piece) in order to acquire a fortune via the sale of rubber. At least I think that's the idea... the movie is a bit unclear about this. Naturally there are natives, of a particular type who made shrunken heads out of some foolish Westerners who preceded Fitzcarraldo. Unbelievably, these catch the vision of dragging a 320 ton steamship across a mountain top and perform the necessary grueling manual labor. Crazy! At 2 1/2 hours long I expected it to drag (like the boat), but it doesn't. Interest is sustained by Klaus Kinski (shown above) - possibly the oddest-looking and most freakish acting thespian in world cinema - and the lunatic plot.

The story was based on something that really happened, but historically the steamship was only 30 tons and was disassembled and hauled over the mountaintop. It begs the question: What kind of director takes folly and magnifies it many times over for the sake of a film? The filming has taken on a legend of its own. Kinski was a major pain during the production. In his book My Best Fiend, director Werner Herzog says that one of the native chiefs offered, in all seriousness, to murder Kinski for him, but that he declined because he needed Kinski to complete filming. Ha!

As for me, I always get a kick out of watching Kinski in a film - he's so crazed. He made a great Nosferatu in the 1979 remake of the film of that name, and was also excellent in Woyzeck. There are certain works that just cry out for the Kinski touch, one was a prior film about a boat in a South American river, Aguirre, the Wrath of God (1972).

My piano lesson last night went better than I expected, despite the fact that the introduction of dreary scales caused me to lose interest. (My teacher said that learning the tricky fingering will keep me from getting Alzheimer's.) Now I have a three page waltz to work on, a work by contemporary composer Dennis Alexander. His pieces are almost always what my teacher calls "lounge music," but I like his use of contemporary idioms. This one is interesting because it changes keys three times - watch those black notes! I'm up for it because I agree with the music critic who once said that "Everything that needs to be said in C major has already been said." My teacher told me that I did a passable job of sight reading it; I look forward to learning it.


22 Feb 2011

I drove up into Maryland twice over the long weekend; on Saturday with my wife for lunch at Annapolis and a visit to an outlet mall in Queenstown, and yesterday with my friend Don to visit a friend in Frederick. Afterwards we briefly stopped at Point of Rocks, Maryland, a place name that popped up on my sat nav that I became curious about. Never been there. There's a railway station (1876) there and that's pretty much it.

I saw an unusual film noir over the weekend, the oddly named No Orchids for Miss Blandish (1948). Why unusual? It created a scandal when it was released in the U.K. For one thing, it is set in New York City with a British cast, which means that everyone save the American lead actor affects rather bizarre dialects. (One psychopathic tough sounds like Spit in the Bowery Boys.) The photo at left gives you an idea of its style: one guy is holding a Tommy gun, another a hand grenade.

A reviewer noted that an unusually high number of statements in the film end with the word, "See?" It's also notable for being unusually violent for a British film; lots of gun deaths. And it's also sexually suggestive - not in any way that would cause surprise nowadays, but definitely over the top in 1948. A British reviewer once said the film had the morals of an alley cat and the sweetness of a sewer. I loved it! I always look for the DAME-HUNGRY KILLER COP RUNS BERSERK element in an old noir, and this film had it in spades - which is unusual because Britnoirs tends to be mannered and rather mild. This was most bizarre and thoroughly over the top Brit noir, ever. Lots of fun.

I also saw Johnny Rocco (1958), a film obviously named after a hood, right? Wrong! Tony Rocco is the hood, Johnny is his 5th grader son! (Oddly enough, Johnny Rocco is also the name of Edward G. Robinson's character in another noir, Key Largo (1948). As Frank Sinatra once observed, the name ends in a vowel so he must be a hood.) The cop killing and the subsequent police investigation is related in terms of the boy, not the father. Interesting angle. Not a bad film, not an especially good one. It's something of a rarity... there doesn't seem to be much on the Internet about it.

I've been digitizing David Bowie and Todd Rundgren Lps over the weekend... some of these albums I listened to on only one of the sides, it seems, or did a quick listen through and committed some of the songs to cassette, where I got to know them. Consequently I'm hearing a lot of stuff I never really heard before. New old stock, in other words.


18 Feb 2011

Here's why you want to shut your cell phone off when you go to bed: When I was on the Metro this morning a woman on a cell phone plunked herself down next to me. "Uh-oh," I thought, "May have to move." (I like to read on the trip into work and hearing one half of a cell phone conversation is a distraction.)

Turned out she wasn't talking to anyone, she was leaving a message. And another. And another. From the Springfield-Franconia stop to the King St. stop this woman left no less than eight messages. I don't know who she thought she had to talk to at 6:50 AM, but nobody was in. (No surprise there!) She got off at King St. station with me, and as I exited the train the last view I got of this commuter yakker was with her cell phone pressed to her head.

Crankshaft (the hero of every grumpy man like me) is right.

The episode caused me to again think about the implications of transhumanism. If there ever comes a time when our biological brains can be melded with semiconductor memory, it may be that a WAN interface will be the means of upload/download/Internet access. Can you imagine this woman having access to your thoughts, whenever she's bored? Yipes. Obviously there will need to be firewalls and, decidedly, an on/off switch.

Every futurist seems to get it wrong at least a little, and Ray Kurzweil is no exception. Here's his vision for 2010. (The Singularity is Near was printed in 2005.) Did he get it right? A dedicated futurist might argue that the computer innovations he writes of are more or less fulfilled via "smartphones" like the iPhone, but what's this nonsense about having computers woven into our clothing? And I feel sure that there will be no computers in any furniture Cari Clark buys.

I watched a cool film last night, called one of Germany's ten most important: Berlin Schonhauser Corner (1957), a JD flick described as being East Germany's answer to our Rebel Without a Cause. It deals with bored teens in the Russian sector of Berlin, hanging out on the streets of Berlin to no good purpose. One pitches a rock at a streetlight for a West German mark (the Wall hadn't been erected yet), and the action begins from there and leads to a dance at a jazz club, the stolen ID market ("Your papers, please" is a signature line in any flick about commies), a teen pregnancy, manslaughter, flight to the West and suicide. I quite enjoyed it. This makes the second East German film production I have seen - along with the famous 1968 socialist musical Heisser Sommer (Hot Summer) - and I would like to see more.

This one had some great night time street photography, but I don't think it was shot on my favorite East German black and white film stock, ORWO. (Yes, I have a favorite German film stock.) The two films I've seen shot with ORWO have velvety blacks with eye popping contrast; this film's night scenes were more described with grays. It still looked impressive, but could have been better.

This week all week long I have been haunted with a Lerner and Loewe song from Camelot, Follow Me. I never thought much of it, and back when I was a teen it had no real significance to me - which makes it all the more annoying now that it seems important to me for some reason. It describes when Merlin is led away to his underground catatonic state by the young enchantress Nimue "...in a cave by a sapphire shore"; it's Nimue's siren song. In a minor key, it's a song about wrapping things up and approaching finality, almost as if to say, "You've had your youth, your life and whatever achievements you'll do. Time has run out. Time to take your nap. Come along - follow me." I suppose it is mythopoetically significant that a woman is leading Merlin away - despite his wisdom and power, this is Mother laying down the law to the little boy.

(But there's a problem. In T.W. White's The Once and Future King, from which Camelot is derived, Merlin doesn't age - he youthens. He lives time backwards. So the Follow Me segment makes little sense.)

The opposite song in Camelot to Follow Me is the Lusty Month of May, which is about youth, the young King and his young reign. I suppose the fall of Camelot begins with Merlin being led away, no longer guiding Arthur who must reign by clumsily hoping to think (as Merlin demanded he do) and arriving at the right conclusions and decisions.

Now when I hear Follow Me I feel struck through the heart. I suppose it's me telling myself that I wasted my youth doing stupid things like listening to the Broadway cast recording of Camelot and reading books too often instead of getting out there and experiencing life. But now it's too late. I've had my youth and it's almost time for the long nap, the Big Sleep. ("We are such things as dreams are made of, and our little lives are rounded with a sleep." - Shakespeare.)

Geez, I'm sorry I put the Camelot video on my queue!

Last night my Webelos den rehearsed some skits we have to do for an upcoming Blue and Gold Banquet. Corralling felines is an order of magnitude easier.

My favorite type of weekend looms: I have no plans. Well, I have to once again repair an annoying plastic hinge on the padded armrest on my VW, but that's hardly major. Having tried and failed with two different epoxies, I'll next try metal and screws. Buying a new part from the VW parts desk is $155! I refuse! I will fix this! (Another option is to ignore it. The padded lid sits atop the armrest compartment and locks in place with no problem.)

Have a great weekend!


17 Feb 2011

One of the annoying things about having your own web site (as opposed to a preformatted blog like this) is HTML. Different browsers can sometimes interpret HTML tags differently. For instance, what looks perfectly fine with Microsoft Internet Explorer is a mess with Firefox.

My daughter Julie pointed out an example of this yesterday while looking around at my Avocado Memories site. I maintain a page that contains reviews I get about the website (basically, complete strangers commenting upon my childhood and how I presented it) - the reviews are mostly excellent, by the way. I kept it as a tool to market the site into a book, an effort I have since given up. Anyway, the page displayed strangely with Firefox and so I had to reverse engineer the HTML tags to figure out how to fix it. This took a while. There are times when I suspect this whole Internet/browser thing isn't fully "there" yet...

Another example of a not-quite-there technology is voice recognition. A friend came by last night and I showed him our new Sonata, with the hand's free Bluetooth voice recognition system. I could press the steering wheel button and say "Call Ethan Clark," and it worked fine, but seemed to be a complete disaster when I tried to call anyone else with the sound of my voice. (There's a funny sequence on Top Gear of Jeremy Clark getting impatient with a Mercedes-Benz.) I remember a similar affair back in about 1996 when an enthusiastic friend at work attempted to show me how easy and efficient word processing was by simply talking to his PC. That, too, was a mess. Haven't voice recognition systems improved at all in fifteen years?

And chatterbots... there's another disappointment. After reading some more of my Ray Kurzweil book (The Singularity is Near) and his predictions about artificial intelligence last night, I decided to try to have a humanistic conversation with one of the many chatterbots on the WWW. After all, one of the tests of artificial intelligence, or AI, is the Turing Test - can you tell the chatterbot isn't human? I did this once before in about 2002 for filler in a rugby e-mail; it did not go especially well. I tried to converse with several, one being "an Australian female between the ages of seventeen and thirty-four who offends rather easily" (thereby shutting down some predictable conversational vulgarities of males). Being a gentleman - even to software - I did no such thing. But our chat was just annoying; "she" responded to every question and statement of mine with a question. I tried A.L.I.C.E. (seen above) again - she seems to have gotten dumber in the eight or nine years since I last tried a conversation. "Talking" to an animated Captain Kirk was silly. And a conversation with another chatterbot was full of responses that were wild non sequiturs.

Keeping all of these real world examples of clunky technology in mind, I found that the Kurzweil book's sections on transhumanism was getting positively Frankensteinian. He postulates that there will come a time when nanobots, who will be able to move atoms and molecules in our bodies around easily, will be able to fix damaged DNA, destroy cancer cells and do everything necessary to prolong biological life almost indefinitely. And our computer memory-augmented minds and consciousness can reside in our biological bodies or not. We might choose instead to exist as computer consciousness in a device, or as an entirely new biological (or not) body created by nanobots. Fancy that. It's the total synthesis of man and machine once sung about by my favorite German techno group Kraftwerk, "The Man-Machine!" ("Man machine/Semi human thing/Man machine/Pseudo human being/Machine, machine, machine..." etc.) "Will robots inherit the earth? Yes, but they will be our children." - Marvin Minsky, 1995.

However, all I can imagine based on yesterday's bouts with technology are grossly deformed humans spouting conversational inanities - with apologetic futurists in their wake. But we shall see.

I watched two noirs last night:

My Name is Julia Ross (1945) - This one had a rather novel movie plot: a older woman and her son and two other accomplices hire a young woman, whom they redesignate in an identify switch as the son's insane wife. He murdered his real wife, and so the plan is to trot this woman around as the sick wife, have her die by "suicide" and thereby cover up the initial murder. Nice little film at 67 minutes.

A Lady Without Passport (1950) - The topic is of current interest as it's about illegal immigration! The chief attraction of this flick, however, was Hedy Lamarr, one of the most beautiful women of her generation (or, for that matter, anyone else's). But you needn't take my world for it: enter her name here and see what turns up. She first appears in the film by way of one of those dramatic Hollywood tricks: the camera comes up to her back as she's looking out a window. Her name is called and she turns around. Bam! It's Hedy Lamarr! The plot and the action of the film was okay, no big deal.

Hedy was as intelligent as she was beautiful: she was a patent holder for spread spectrum radio communication, a.k.a. frequency hopping! I first became aware of her via a photo of her topless in the 1933 Czech film Ecstasy, shown in the big Daniel C. Blum movie book I used to thumb through as a child. Page 125.

:)


16 Feb 2011

A reader of this blog once asked me if there was a specific time that I knew the Sixties were over and the Seventies had begun. Thinking about it, yes, there were some milestones, and I wrote a little article about it for my Avocado Memories website. Thinking about it more, I realized that I could also recall some milestones for the Fifties-Sixties transition and the Seventies-Eighties transition. Article here.

I returned to the dark world of film noir last night:

So Dark the Night (1946): An interesting murder mystery set in a French village. It had a trick solution that I didn't see coming right away, which is rare. An entertaining little 70 minute addition to the noir canon.

Nobody Lives Forever (1946): A great film featuring noir street guy John Garfield in full John Garfield style, which is to say that he's brash, energetic, street wise, tough and charming. Like Bogie, but younger and somewhat more vulnerable. During World War II my father reported that he could usually get somebody to buy him a drink simply by stating that he was from Brooklyn (as he actually was). New Yorkers and Brooklyners back then were considered all-American types, and Garfield made a film career out of this kind of presence. As if Garfield wasn't enough, this film also featured the beloved and ever cool Walter Brennan, who even in 1946 looked old enough to be called "Pops." (His wikipedia article makes note of the fact that he could often play parts for men older than he was with great success.) He has a great street scam in this film: a hustler, like Garfield, he invites people to look through his telescope for a dime. He then relieves them of their wallets while they're doing so!

Walter Brennan isn't well known to the younger cohort of Americans today; he died in 1974. It is worth mentioning, however, that he has won three Oscars for Best Supporting Actor and is tied with Jack Nicholson for the most Oscars for a male actor. I remember him from The Real McCoys, which ran on television from 1957 to 1963. He played an old West Virginian farmer - I was stunned when I learned that he was really from Massachusetts!

Last night I read an interesting section in Ray Kurzweil's The Singularity is Near: It's in the section about the computer memory enhancement of the human brain, which Kurzweil is convinced will happen sometime later this century - sooner rather than later. With the accurate modeling of the functions of biological brains, it will become possible to model the human mind with computer memory, and to augment the brain with these computer components. One obvious advantage of this is a greatly augmented memory (Mr. Know-It-All) with faster processing speed, as semiconductor memory operates much faster than does biological memory. Also, individual functions of the brain can be enhanced. Want to know how to play the piano, or become adept in math, or acquire analysis skills? Augment that part of the brain with the appropriate software. Wow. The term for this sort of thing, by the way, is transhumanism - my new word for the day.

But Kurzweil isn't content to do passive theorizing. In some rather astonishing passages he describes his own biology... he was diagnosed with a condition leading to type 2 diabetes and a genetic predilection for heart disease (his father died young) which he staves off by taking 250 pills a day and weekly injections - with the assistance of a medical doctor. By doing so he is biologically younger than his chronological age and has no physical indications of diabetes. He actually thinks that he - and other Baby Boomers - can sustain his life and youthfulness to the point where he can be biologically restored to a younger age via nanobots and technology (the "Singularity"). With any other guy I would think, "Nonsense! This madman is deluded."

An amusing quote about Kurzweil's books: Pulitzer Prize winner Douglas Hofstadter has said of Kurzweil's and Hans Moravec's (another transhumanist) books: "It’s as if you took a lot of very good food and some dog excrement and blended it all up so that you can't possibly figure out what's good or bad. It's an intimate mixture of rubbish and good ideas, and it's very hard to disentangle the two, because these are smart people; they're not stupid."

The nanorobotic revolution may be nearer than we think. After reading I did some quick wikipedia research and was rather blown away by the Nanodragster! Wheelbase: 50,000 times thinner than a human hair. The rear wheels are made of 60 carbon atoms (but not by Pirelli). Top speed: 0.014 mm per hour. Top Gear really ought to do a segment on this... I can see the inevitable jokes about getting Richard Hammond (the shortest member of the cast) to drive it.


15 Feb 2011

Over the weekend I washed and waxed the Sonata and took the Official Sonata New Car Photos for the family scrapbook: Cari and her Ride, the Clark Fleet, the Sonata has a backup camera.

Yesterday I gave a thorough waxing to the VW - both cars are now shiny. Yesterday outside was nearly 72 degrees by the house thermometer and Cari and I dropped the top on the VW and had a Valentine's Day lunch at Mike's, the excellent local restaurant we've been frequenting since 1987. Very pleasant.

Camelot! Camelot! Now sing it out with love and joy! Or not.

Last night I watched a video of the 1982 Broadway revival of Lerner and Loewe's Camelot, starring Richard Harris. I've never been a fan of the 1967 movie; for me, the stage musical worked better. But up to last night I've never seen a staging of it before despite being overly-familiar with all the songs via the original cast recording when I was a teen. What was unexpected was having a flood of sad little memories come back to me while I listened to one of the songs... I was such a solitary and singular fifteen year-old. This must be an aging thing, "regrets of youth."

Reading about King Arthur or seeing Camelot is a lot like reading an account of the Battle of Hastings: sad and disappointing. The kingdom always falls, the darkness always ensues. They try to salvage things with an upbeat message in the musical (Tom of Warwick - in real life Sir Thomas Malory - will live on to write the story of Camelot in a famous early book), but we all know what happens next. Arthur and his bastard son Mordred meet on a ghastly battlefield, Arthur says "Now hast thy death day come" and kills him, falling mortally wounded himself. He is taken away to Avalon, the Island of the Apples, to recover from his wounds to once again preserve Britain in its hour of dire peril, but this is scant comfort. (Where was he in 1940, when he was really needed?) The darkness still falls.

Back in junior high I was a young compleatist and obsessed with the Arthurian legends, and read everything the school and public libraries had at hand. Yes, everything, even Tennyson. (The Idylls of the King: Was that ever painful!) At the time I had a high tolerance for wading through medieval phraseology ("...he smote him full sore upon the helm and all who were gathered forthwith agreed that no knight had ever dealt another such a mighty blow," etc.), that I seem to have utterly lost. When I encounter it now I sort of mentally go "Ack!" and quit reading. I doubt I could make it through Malory's book again. And, again, it brings to mind memories I'd just as soon forget.

What has always been annoying to me about Camelot is the 1960s political spin put upon it. From wikipedia: "In American contexts, the word "Camelot" is sometimes used to refer admiringly to the presidency of John F. Kennedy, as his term was said to have potential and promise for the future, and many were inspired by Kennedy's speeches, vision, and policies. At the time, Kennedy's assassination had been compared to the fall of King Arthur. The lines "Don't let it be forgot, that once there was a spot, for one brief shining moment, that was known as Camelot," from the musical Camelot, were quoted by his widow Jacqueline as being from his favorite song in the score. "There'll be great Presidents again," she added, "but there'll never be another Camelot again ... it will never be that way again."

Right. The Bay of Pigs, the escalation of troops into Vietnam, "Cuber" - that's some dream.

American presidents are not monarchs - thank goodness! - and their administrations are not glorious reigns. Democracy and the business of government is messy, and with even the best of them there are compromises, missteps and scandals. Besides, the medieval world had nothing like our fractious and polarized media, which is ready, willing and able to knock any would-be King Arthur off his high throne in short order. Look at Obama: From Rock Star Messiah to a hiss and a byword in two short years.

I said that I had read everything I could find about King Arthur... but there is one work which eludes me. My rugby pal Bob at work was also interested in the Arthurian legends; every now and then we have interesting conversations on the subject. My interest is more towards an actual, historical Arthur who wasn't a king but a 6th C. battle leader of the Romano-Celts against the Angles and Saxons. Bob doesn't care about that Arthur at all, but is more interested in the fabulous, high medieval literary Arthur who never did or could exist. Bob actually started a book about Arthur and his Knights that I badly want to read; Bob refuses to let me read it. Why? It couldn't possibly be worse than Marion Zimmer Bradley's book, or others I have dutifully read. And from Bob's descriptions of the characters, it sounds promising. Relent, Bob.

That Ray Kurzweil book I'm reading (The Singularity is Near) is getting thick. I'm mired in a section about how the brain functions and how thinking can be emulated by computers that seems an unnecessary tangent to the topic at hand, but this is no pop book for laymen. It gets technical. I am still not convinced that a "singularity" - the point in human history where our technology surpasses our biology - will take place or how it will matter. The futurists are usually fabulously wrong with their predictions. But I'm only a third of the way into the book and Kurzweil hasn't yet fully developed his case.

Well. If the Singularity brings with it the knowledge of how to quickly cure headaches, I'm all for it. I have one now, and would really like nothing better than to crawl back into bed.


14 Feb 2011

Happy Valentine's Day! This is the day when I'd visit a mall to purchase flowers and a card and find myself in a long line of men of similar intent.

We did the annual Five Families Valentine's Day thing on Saturday; this is where the five drama dads (the husbands, of which I am one) gather at a FF house and prepare dinner for the five drama mamas (our wives). As usual, I took a photo to commemorate same. It was fun. During it I heard somebody mention a news story about the zodiac changing and adding a 13th sign, and that the astrological signs have changed. What? I hadn't heard that; it's of interest to me because I used to cast charts. So I checked it out. As it turns out, nope, this concerns the sidereal zodiac which astronomers use, not the tropical one upon which Western astrology is based. So I remain a Taurus. Not that it means anything.

A subject that gets occasional comment on my Avocado Memories site is the odd bellows table my mother came home with one day - it sat in the living room as our coffee table. Yes, that's right, an oversized bellows fashioned into a table. Dad hated it; he used to bark his shins against the tack heads. I mentioned that the thing could be seen in Marilyn Lovell's living room in Apollo 13; here it is! I wonder if she really had one... and I wonder if Jim Lovell has scrape scars on his legs...

I finished reading Stolen Valor last night - excellent book. Causes you to look at Vietnam and its participants in an entirely different way. I will never again be able look at some guy in torn up Vietnam era military clothing bestrewn with pins and patches without wondering, "I wonder if he really served there?"

I am now reading Ray Kurzweil's The Singularity is Near. What's the singularity? The actual term is technological singularity; according to Kurzweil and like-minded writers, it refers to a point in time after which mankind's technological progress makes life qualitatively different and much harder to predict. Kurzweil says it's the point at which mankind's technology transcends his biology and enables him to vastly extend his life, become greatly more intelligent, etc. It's based on the notion that someday - someday relatively soon - computers will become more intelligent than humans. Yes, I know. It sounds like a lot of baloney. Nobody disparages futurists more than I do and yet I find myself reading this book. Why?

It starts off well enough. The section I'm in talks about the exponential (not linear) progress in computing and technology. Chips becomes progressively cheaper, faster, smaller and denser on a logarithmic scale. So does memory, and this becomes paradigm breaking.

Take what I'm doing now, digitizing my vinyl Lps. When I was a young Marine and drove my 1974 Super Beetle, I could fit about ten cassettes into my glove box. Each 90 minute cassette (I also used C-60's) could hold about 22 songs. That's a mobile library of about about 220 songs, total. That 1970's paradigm - cassettes in my car - remained in place until I got rid of my 1995 Pontiac, which had a cassette player, in 2007. I replaced it with a VW New Beetle Convertible that has a CD player which can (almost always) play mp3s on CD - a great advance in music compaction. Now I can store about 140 mp3s on one CD and keep books containing 25 CDs in my car. But that's a false, short-timed advance.

The real advance is what I'm doing now with my new Sonata, which has a USB port. You can plug an iPod or thumb drives or hard disks into it which the audio system can play. (You can also plug an iPod into my VW's system, but this is an audio input only. You still have to control the iPod from the iPod. The Sonata's system allows you to control the iPod or the hard disk from the front panel.)

I am now in the process of ripping CDs and digitizing Lps (I have already done my cassette collection) to make a new collection to put on a portable hard drive which is somewhat larger in size than one cassette box. This hard drive is only about half used (50 GB out of 114 GB) and has 11,839 music files on it. I can fit about 23,000 music files onto it, which may represent most or a good chunk of my total music collection. That's a logarithmic, not linear, increase.

Kurzweil's book makes the case that the actual rate of technological change is greatly in excess of what humans and futurists predict, and that's because change that rapid and profound is hard for us to appreciate and understand. Not to mention form a basis for making predictions about what's to come.

Ray Kurzweil (shown above) is an extremely intelligent fellow and an inventor; I'm more inclined to lend his words weight. And he has a section dedicated to naysayers. So it promises to be an interesting book...

I watched Tiger Bay (1959) last night, Hayley Mills' first movie. It was quite good. I can see why people saw this and thought, "Hey - she can really act!" Noirish, perhaps even film noir, if Bobby Driscoll's The Window from 1949 and based on a Cornell Woolrich is a true noir - this has a similar plot.

I also saw The Split (1968) starring Jim Brown. Any film with Jack Klugman and Ernest Borgnine is going to have comic aspects, and this is no different. It's a heist film with noirish touches, and it was great to see scenes shot in Los Angeles c. 1968 which is, after all, my era.

Finally, Nora Prentiss (1947) was excellent. I like Ann Sheridan's sassy, world-wise demeanor...


11 Feb 2011

As I mentioned yesterday we heard Rachmaninoff's 2nd Piano Concerto and Bruckner's 6th Symphony last night at Strathmore. Nice performance space - but I still prefer the Concert Hall at the Kennedy Center. It's one of my favorite hang-outs. The performances? A teeny tiny Chinese gal in a red gown came out and got huge, gorgeous sounds out of a nine foot Steinway concert grand with the Baltimore Symphony Orchestra. Even as I type this, Rachmaninoff's melodies swirl around in my head. What a wonderful concerto!

The Bruckner... well, that's a different story. In what read almost like an apology, the program notes mention that a segment of the concert-going public finds his music incomprehensible and boring. You can almost add me to that list; you can certainly add my wife. As I wrote yesterday, I had never heard his 6th Symphony before. (Note that the wikipedia article mentions that it's oft-neglected and thought of as the "ugly duckling" of Bruckner's symphonic oeuvre.) I'm familiar with and have recordings of his 4th and 9th, but don't listen to them often.

The first movement seemed clunky - at times it seemed as if the brass section of the BSO wasn't up to Bruckner's monolithic chords, and there were a couple of times that Cari and I looked at each other in a silent question, "Did the trumpets just muff that part?" The second, slow, movement was just plain boring. Cari called it "musical wallpaper," a phrase from favorite lecturer Robert Greenberg which I usually apply to Baroque music. The third movement, a scherzo, was by far the most successful, I thought. It reminded me a lot of the scherzo in the 9th, which is a symphony movement I greatly like. They shared the same restless energy. The advantage of seeing a piece played live is that the visual part of seeing, say, the basses playing a persistent one note rhythm reinforces what you're hearing. It helps with the understanding of the work. The final movement was just sort of "eh," and it ended the symphony on a curious note. The applause was rather tepid and the old folks started blowing out of the concert hall post haste. Clearly, this symphony is not one of the world-beaters.

Poor Anton Bruckner. Despite the fact that he's regarded as a major composer, he doesn't get a lot of respect. Even his friend Gustav Mahler called him "half simpleton, half god." The Bruckner "sound" is composed of great, huge blocks of brass and string sonorities - as if he scored organ music for a orchestra. (Significantly, he was a renowned organist.) His melodies tend to be long and drawn out rather than clipped, as in some Beethoven symphonies. And there are "Bruckner pauses," short moments where the orchestra plays nothing before a major statement. "I must catch my breath before I speak," said Bruckner. It's all a bit ponderous, and many listeners find his music slow and - the word is inescapable - boring. The Nazis, those cultural snobs, adored Bruckner's music while scorning lively and clever Berlin cabaret tunes. Dolts.

(But, really, what do critics like me know? One idiot claimed that the wonderful music of Ralph Vaughan-Williams was "...rather like a cow staring at a landscape." But another symphonist, Jean Sibelius, had perhaps the best quote: "Nobody ever erected a statue to the memory of a critic.")

Anton Bruckner strikes me as the sort of guy who, in college, finished his homework for Monday on Friday nights. And he's the only composer I know who has a Symphony #0! (He named it this himself.) His intentions are lofty, however. Religious to a fault, one gets the impression that his works are homages to our Heavenly Father. In fact, his Ninth Symphony is dedicated to "dem lieben Gott" ("the beloved God").

But wait! There's this somewhat jarring passage in wikipedia: "Bruckner never married; he was attracted to teenage girls, who turned down the proposals of the older man. One such was the daughter of a friend, called Louise; in his grief he is believed to have written the cantata "Entsagen" (Renunciation). His affection for teenage girls led to an accusation of impropriety where he taught music, and while he was exonerated, he decided to concentrate on teaching boys afterwards. His calendar for 1874 details the names of girls who appealed to him, and the list of such girls in all his diaries was very long. (My daughter Meredith would call him a "creeper.") In 1880 he fell for a 17-year-old peasant girl in the cast of the Oberammergau Passion Play. His interest in girls appears to have been based on the assumed virtue retained through their being young, and lasted as long as they seemed worthy of marriage; he feared sin. His unsuccessful proposals to teenage girls continued into his seventies; one potential relationship that might have been suitable when he was older came to nothing because the girl would not convert to Catholicism." Whew! What's going on, here?

Teenage girls nonetheless, I shall complete my piece on Anton Bruckner with this curious link, "Anton Bruckner Arrives in Heaven" (greeted by - from left to right - Liszt, Wagner, Schubert, Schumann, Weber, Mozart, Beethoven, Gluck, Haydn, Handel, and, inevitably, Bach). Ha!

Ah, Friday.. It certainly took its sweet time to get here. Tomorrow there's a Five Families St. Valentine's Day dinner thing to do, and at some point I need to wash and wax our new Sonata and get a photo of Cari in it for the family scrapbook. I think I may wait for the temperature to rise above the teens. The Sonata drove like a dream up to Strathmore and back last night. I do have a criticism of the sat nav, however: I programmed it for Strathmore and it ended the instructions a few blocks away. What th-? A bit jarring if one isn't familiar with the territory. On Sunday we may take it on a joy ride to somewhere in Virginia.

Have a great weekend!


10 Feb 2011

Last night was British film night Chez Clark. Thanks to noir guru Michael Keaney I finally saw Whistle Down the Wind (1961), a film I have wanted to see again ever since I first saw it as an eight year-old. I am happy to report that it holds up very well. Clearly, I didn't fully appreciate it as a kid. I mainly remember it as the provocative first feature which preceded the unsettling and creepy Village of the Damned.

The plot concerns a runaway murderer who, while hiding in a barn on a remote Lancashire farm, is believed to be Jesus Christ by the local children. The story is essentially about faith and innocence and about how children taken things literally, and without guile. Hayley Mills is in it, and her record still stands: I have never seen a bad Hayley Mills film. They are all quite good: Pollyanna (1960), The Parent Trap (1961), Summer Magic (1963), The Moon-Spinners (1964), That Darn Cat! (1965), The Trouble With Angels (1966)... Even better, Michael let me borrow her first film, Tiger Bay (1959); I'm looking forward to seeing it.

I also watched an Ealing comedy from 1953, The Titfield Thunderbolt. Ealing comedies are like Penguin paperbacks, Converse Hightops or vintage VW Beetles - they are perfection. In this day and age Ealings are more gently amusing and charming than ha ha funny comedies, but that's okay since I see very few of those anyway. This one's in Technicolor, and a good part of its charm is seeing that poky little title locomotive chugging along green, green English countrysides. And, of course, there are also those wonderful postwar British character actors.

Tonight is cool... we have tickets to hear the Baltimore Symphony Orchestra at Strathmore in North Bethesda, Maryland. I've never been there. The BSO will be playing Bruckner's Sixth Symphony and Rachmaninoff's Second Piano Concerto. I am familiar with Bruckner's 4th and 9th symphonies, but I've never heard his 6th. The Rachmaninoff is a well-known piece, arguably his most famous work. Interestingly, it was completed after the composer suffered a bout of depression after poor reviews of his first symphony. His doctor, Nicholai Dahl, helped him with hypnotism, telling him, "You will be able to complete your concerto. It will be a work of great quality..." He did and it was. A very tuneful work, it spawned a cottage industry of people reusing melodies from it for popular songs.

Funny thing is, these days I can't hear the opening movement without thinking of a student film my daughter Julie once did, The House on 24th Street. (The concerto music is suddenly interrupted at the 4:47 mark with Philip Glass' string quartet music for Dracula, which I downloaded for Julie.) Check out this 8 1/2 minute film; I think you'll agree that it's quite good. And there are outtakes at the end! As my daughter Meredith once said, "The Clarks have the arts covered..."

I posted a sad little image to my Burbankia page yesterday, Lockheed demolition. An aggressively overboard pro-environmental stance combined with high tax, anti-business policies on the part of the liberal state legislature have caused industries and companies in California to move elsewhere. Southern California no longer has an aerospace industry. Lockheed left Burbank for greener fields in Georgia in the Nineties; I used to work at the plant where this hangar was located. Very sad. The facilities where America's greatest aircraft - the P-38 "Lightning," the SR-71 "Blackbird," the Constellation - were built is now a large shopping plaza, with only silhouetted images of the planes atop the signs to remind people of Burbank's aerospace heritage.

I am a political conservative because I can see the results of the opposite, statist policies. California has been governed by liberal Democrats for decades; the inevitable decline of the state is the inevitable result. Foreign correspondents are wondering, is California the United States' first failed state? I wonder. At any rate, it is no longer the place in which I grew up...


9 Feb 2011

The book I'm reading, Stolen Valor by B.G. Burkett (shown at left) and Glenna Whitley, is very eye-opening.

For instance, ever since I saw the teleplay The Execution of Private Slovik in 1974, I knew that Pvt. Eddie Slovik was the only man executed in World War II. Why? Because the Media told me. But this isn't true at all, and with foot-noted reference after foot-noted reference Burkett makes the point that even in the "good war" there were atrocities and subsequent military executions. (Book excerpt.)

Were massacres confined to Vietnam? Absolutely not. Burkett illustrates that this type of thing also occurred in World War II, but was hushed up and never brought to the public's attention by the Media, which, by the Sixties, had an embedded antiwar agenda that hurt and continues to hurt the credibility of Vietnam veterans. Reading this, it occurs to me that with all the real Vietnam vets I have known in the Marines and in civilian life, I have never met one who seemed unbalanced or disturbed in any way.

One thing I didn't know was that Dan Rather, the wacky former CBS newsman, never completed Marine Corps boot camp although he made misleading claims about being in the Marines. Sorry, Dan. You are only a Marine once you graduate, not before. The Drill Instructors pointedly referred to us as "recruits" until graduation day, when we sat in the base theater and the officer in charge of our series greeted us with, "Good morning, Marines." I recall that well. When he said that it was like somebody poured hot water all over me.

Anyway, this is an excellent book. Some of the best parts deal with the author debunking the claims of various fake Vietnam vets, who appear in Media reports dressed in sloppy old uniform shirts, claiming to be former Special Forces operatives and suffering various post traumatic stress problems based on atrocities they claim the government forced them to commit. A simple FOIA request to the National Records Center by Burkett soon establishes otherwise. Could the reporters have done that? Easily. Did they? No.

My mistrust of the Media is not merely because I am a political conservative; it's based on observation.

1.) On July 4th 1983 I took part in a Civil War reenactment battle in a Kiwanis Park in Provo, Utah. During a cannon misfire - the crew were not swabbing out the sparks left in the breech adequately and the cannon fired when a powder charge was rammed down the barrel - a man was grievously injured. By the time I got to Salt Lake City I heard on the radio that a man had been injured when "...a cannon ball had struck him in the chest." As if we're firing real ordnance at each other!

2.) On 9/11 I recall hearing reports on the radio that a car bomb had gone off outside the State Department. That didn't happen. A simple phone call to a rugby friend who worked there confirmed that.

3.) Also on 9/11, I recall the estimates of Pentagon fatalities well into the hundreds. Listening to reports of these numbers I had an idea that the true number was probably well below this and that, once again, the Media was getting it wrong. Sure enough, the actual number was well under what was estimated during the day.

It appears that the Media doesn't bother to do fact checking anymore. For contrast, Burkett includes a funny quote from an old school newspaperman, Pulitzer Prize winner Bob Greene: "If your mother says she loves you, check it out."

I see there's a Stolen Valor website, done with the involvement of the book author. Looks interesting. Good heavens, look at this! What scoundrels! Well. Up to this point I was always sheepish about my military service in the Marines; I never got deployed anywhere and filled out my four year enlistment in an undistinguished way. But at least I'm honest about it!

I had my piano lesson last night; it didn't go especially well. I made a mess out of the two pieces I normally play much better when alone. I attribute this in part to the Diet Coke I had with my dinner. While the caffeine doesn't seem to affect me much - in fact, I can take a nap as soon as I finish a can - it seems to make me fidgety when I play. My fingers go all over the place. I should have known better. Also, the new car we bought last week took attention away from piano practice (I am easily distracted). The piano lesson was also disappointing in that my teacher also gave me a scales book to work on. Scales. How unspeakably dreary! I recall these when I took lessons as a kid... I was hoping I wouldn't have to do these as an adult.

I didn't watch a film noir last night - I watched Burn Witch, Burn (1962) instead. It was an undistinguished horror film. I barely kept awake through it.


8 Feb 2011

Weekend films noir:

Talk About a Stranger (1952) - Essentially, a tale about a boy and his dog. It's in various film noir encyclopedias and books, but I don't accept this as film noir. A movie about a boy and his dog cannot be noir unless it has a solid central crime - and the accidental poisoning of the dog just doesn't cut it. But I seem to be alone in this. It's a good movie and I enjoyed it, but look, just because famous noir lighting specialist John Alton worked on it, that doesn't make it noir! It seemed more like A Very Special Episode of Lassie to me than a real noir.

The People Against O'Hara (1951) - An MGM bigger budget noir starring Spencer Tracey as an ex-alcoholic lawyer. I quite enjoyed it. Even better, it has John Alton's signature long shadows and pools of light - the urban street scenes look quite nice. ("Nice" being the noirhead's term for "mysterious and dangerous.")

The Reckless Moment (1949) - A fun Joan Bennett film. Years before she played an icy, upper-class matron on Dark Shadows (the 1960's television soap opera with vampires and werewolves) she was hot stuff in film noir. In this she's an upper middle class dame and mother of a troublesome teenage girl, from whence the noir plot develops, and a boy with an incredibly adenoidal voice. (I kept hoping his voice would drop during the course of the movie, but it didn't.) The love angle between Bennett and her blackmailer was a bit hard to accept, but, on the whole, good film.

Drive a Crooked Road (1954) - Mickey Rooney as a conflicted loner race car driver who gets involved in a bank heist. Mickey Rooney in a film noir? Why, sure. He made a number of them, at least four I've seen. Such is The Mick's talent that he's worth watching in almost anything he's in, and this film was no exception. Mickey Rooney is still alive! And he's still making films! He was born in 1920, making him 91 this year; his first stage appearance was when he was only fifteen months, which means that he's been acting for nine decades, an amazing, unsurpassable feat.

He's also well known for the subject of his wives - he's on his eighth. A few of them are worth mentioning... Ava Gardner was his first wife; she's generally credited as being one of the most beautiful women in Hollywood (do a google image search and you'll see). Not bad for a little guy. She, of course, took up with Frank Sinatra. She was the femme fatale in an excellent noir, The Killers (1946). Wife Number Three was Martha Vickers, the celebrated nympho of The Big Sleep(1946). (There's a TON of lore about that film... some of the weirder bits are here.)

Wife Number Five was Carolyn Mitchell (once known as "the prettiest girl in Phoenix"), born Barbara Ann Thomason when Rooney was doing Andy Hardy films. She was murdered by Milos Milos who played the very creepy incubus in the 1965 William Shatner film of the same name. Interesting story there - and with the so-called "Incubus curse." (The three are shown above; sometimes the story behind a film is at least as interesting as the film itself.)

I'll conclude with a funny quote from his fourth wife, Elaine Devry: "Living with Mickey is no bed of roses. Six wives can't all be wrong."

As I mentioned, I am now reading Stolen Valor, that book about how Vietnam veterans are stereotyped as drug addicts, drunks, baby killers and losers despite the evidence showing otherwise. It's a hard book for me to read as I tend to get emotional about this... in other words, I'm getting angry reading this book. The Media and my own generation have done Vietnam veterans an appalling and shameful disservice. Ever since I was a child I have despised hippies, Vietnam war protesters and the whole 1960's New Left movement.

The real shame, to me, is not that we got embroiled in Vietnam. South Vietnam was a friendly nation with whom we had treaties as a part of American interest and foreign policy. They were invaded by North Vietnam. JFK, the martyred darling of the Left, committed us to the war when he announced, "Let every nation know, whether it wishes us well or ill, that we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe, in order to assure the survival and the success of liberty. This much we pledge—and more." The more shameful thing was how Vietnam veterans were treated by cowards, hypocrites, the unworthy and the ungrateful while they were away and upon their arrival back home. Shameful!

I'm changing the subject. As I said, this is a hot button of mine and a blog topic of its own.

In the blog comments from last week, the topic came up of so called "speed reading." Yes, I can speed read. I learned how to do this back when I was in junior high school as a natural result of reading a lot. I took a class in it in high school, and as I recall I was rated at being able to read about 900 words per minute with a 90% retention rate - I remember the nines. This only goes to show that if you do something long enough you'll get good at it. But that was then and this is now. With the books I normally read, historical non-fiction, my speed may be slower because it's thicker to get through than the conversational prose used in fiction.

The Internet era has changed things, as well. I tend to simply scan much more than I ever did; it's very rare when I actually read every word in every paragraph these days. But all that being said, I can still read quickly. Which is good because the Internet has made me more impatient... I expect facts and data to come up quickly, be scanned and digested, and to move on. I guessing that my retention of facts has dropped dramatically since I was a teen.

Getting old, ya know...



7 Feb 2011

What does the United States Government, specifically, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, have against men?

Friday February 4th was "National Wear Red Day." Not being aware of this I went to the workplace health center to do a blood pressure check, which I sometimes do to make sure my lisinopril prescription is working. When I arrived, the nurse, a woman with whom I have a good relationship and with whom I joke a lot, gave me a "red dress" pin to take home to my wife. Have you see the government's red dress campaign? The intent is to raise awareness of heart risks - among women. All well and good - I mean, who can be against saving women's lives? - but hang on a minute, what about the other half of the population, men? Heart disease is also the #1 killer of men, but we don't get an expensive ad campaign. We just get... (silence).

The whole pink ribbon breast cancer awareness thing has been in our faces for years and nobody really knows how much money is collected (billions?) or what it's really being used for. Who could possibly be churlish enough to question breast cancer fundraising? Well, my wife and I. We wonder where it's all really going. Call us cynical, but we have noticed that where there is a great deal of money being generated or raised, the possibility of it being improperly diverted is high.

Here's another thing: Men, who die of prostate cancer at the same rate women die of breast cancer, have funding for prostate cancer at fractional levels compared to that of breast cancer. Compare Federal funding for breast cancer vs. funding for prostate cancer: Here, here and here. Add in private donations and the disparity widens.

So. I'm seated with the blood pressure strap around my arm having an animated discussion along these lines with the nurse when I happen to look at the back of red dress pin. I see "U.S. Department of Health and (female) Human Services" (my tax dollars at work) MADE IN CHINA. Our government is buying these things from China? My blood pressure, normally around 115/70, shot up to 170/90. We both laughed. After screaming Serenity Now! we tried it again, 116/82. That's better.

Lest you think I am being totally boorish I will state that my wife developed stage one breast cancer in 2006 and is now, five years later, still cancer free. Hooray! However, she is even more tired of the pink ribbon campaign than I am. We get dunned at Safeway: "Would you care to donate to breast cancer research?" "No," she says, "I donated thousands of dollars when I had it, thank you very much." Next time I get asked this I'm going to respond, "No, but I would be happy to donate to your prostate cancer research fund raiser. Oh, wait... you don't have one."

Last night, in a break from films noir, I watched Francois Truffaut's The 400 Blows (1959), widely considered to be one of the triumphs of French cinema. It often appears on critics' Top Fifty Films lists. I liked it, but not as much as they did. It's great seeing black and white footage of Paris streets in 1959, storefronts, Renaults buzzing around, etc. - very interesting. The title of the film comes from a French phrase, which, loosely translated, means "Raising Hell" (which is what the film's protagonist, a twelve year-old boy, does).

Reading about it on wikipedia led me to a curiosity called the British Film Institute's list of the 50 films you should see by the age of 14. What a bizarre list! No adaptations of Huckleberry Finn or Tom Sawyer? And Jacques Tati's Play Time (1967) is guaranteed to bore any typical child. And what's Night of the Hunter and Some Like it Hot doing on there? Weird!

The list included Whistle Down the Wind, a provocative 1961 British Hayley Mills film. Good luck finding that one... I've been trying for years. Blockbuster, Hollywood and even Video Vault never had it and Netflix doesn't, either. I saw it as a child in 1964 in a theater also showing the Village of the Damned (what were my parents thinking?). Both films were excellent and made a distinct impression on me. I would dearly like to see the Hayley Mills films again; I've never seen her in a bad film - I don't think she made any. (I saw the two Damned films as an adult, both are genuinely creepy, unsettling and hold up well.)

As for films for children, I have my own child-tested, much more useful and comprehensive list. (It also tells you what to avoid. There are a lot of really crappy films out there intended for children.)

I learned recently that Henry Ford spent a night at a famous rock house in Burbank I used to see all the time... cool.


4 Feb 2011

Sunday is Ronald Reagan's 100th birthday, and to commemorate it the local conservative throwaway paper gave out little packages of jelly beans this morning! How I wish a man like Ronald Reagan was in the White House now...

British film composer John Barry died on Sunday. He's primarily known for his work on the James Bond films, but he did so much more than that. I think he was the hand's down best composer working in film, and I always looked forward to hearing a new score. I have just about worn out my Body Heat soundtrack CD...

He had a sound, the John Barry sound. Primarily heard in the low basses and brass in canon, it could be mysterious and ominous or slinky and sexy. In fact, I'll see a film I wouldn't normally watch just to hear Barry's score for it (Somewhere in Time). I hope somebody puts together a really good anthology. And I would really like to hear if Barry wrote any concert music, that is, sonatas, suites or concertos.

How God Created Virginia.

Last night my wife and I watched a curious film noir, Ride the Pink Horse (1947). It was curious because it contains the word "pink" in the title (not noirish at all!), and because of the protagonist, who was an unlikable lout of rather low intelligence. The film wasn't really about much - a sort of half-baked revenge story. But it had a quality which caused you to stay tuned in. A decided oddity. (The pink horse of the title, by the way, referred to a carousel which formed some sort of spiritual setting to the tale.) I'm having a difficult time figuring out what film noir sub-genre it fits into. Revenge? Damaged veteran? It seems to be somewhat unique unto itself.

Last night I finished reading a Michael Crichton thriller, State of Fear, which totally lambasted the Global Warming movement and its adherents. I enjoyed that aspect of it since I think Global Warming is more of a religion than a science, but I didn't care much for this novel. It seems that Crichton was writing specifically with a major motion picture adaptation in mind - a motion picture I probably wouldn't like. He needn't have bothered this time, however. Nobody in Hollywood is about to make a film about how Global Warming is bogus, especially one based on a novel which contains a scene wherein a brainless Hollywood actor/environmental advocate is carved up bit by bit and eaten by savage tribes. (As much as I'd enjoy seeing that on screen. I'm guessing that the audience would cheer the way they did when the lawyer got eaten by velociraptors in Jurassic Park.)

I am now starting to read Stolen Valor by B.G. Burkett and Glenna Whitley, which claims to give the true and factual picture of real life Vietnam vets, instead of the stereotyped image of druggies, losers and psychopaths which seems to give the Media comfort and assurance. But this isn't news to me; I've had real Vietnam vets telling me this all along. And the ones I came into contact with during my time in the Marines were generally stable, untroubled and successful. But I'm sure I will be blogging more about this work as I get further into it...

Mystery solved! When I was in London I became curious about the lighting of the Palace of Westminster, perhaps more famously known as the Parliament building. It is quite beautiful, and lit up at night as it is, it's a natural photographic subject. Here's my 2008 image, with caption. But I was curious about the unlit corner - why is it kept dark? Is it for some security reason, or does somebody live there who would object to the lights? I did some research on the Interweb, but couldn't find an answer. So I sent an e-mail to the House of Commons via the U.K. Parliament website. They didn't know right away, and had to make inquiries.

Here's the answer I got: "Dear Mr Clark, Thank you once again for your enquiry and please accept my apologies for the delay in responding. I have now received a reply from the Estates Maintenance Manger regarding your query and received the following response: 'The Main floodlighting on the river side is located on the terrace, however the Speakers Apartment Tower has no terrace on the river side (it goes straight down to the river) so there is nowhere to place the floodlights. We have experimented with floodlighting from the top of the building but it was not successful due to H&S and maintenance issues but we are looking at this again with the advent of LED technology.' I hope that this is helpful. Yours sincerely, Debbie Cesvette, House of Commons Information Office."

I might have known it would be a simple answer. Occam's Razor... the simplest answer is usually the correct one.

I got a neat quote from a reader today: In silvis viva silui; iam mortua cano. Translated from the Latin, "In the woods alive I was silent; now dead I sing." Andy writes, "...a quote given to me by an elderly man from the Ninth Ward of New Orleans. Whether obvious to you or not, it is most probably about a violin or other such stringed instrument. He did not know whom to attribute it to. Neither does Google. I had recited to him a poem I wrote twelve years ago that began, 'A violin has wood for skin; within a tree it's bound.'" All of which causes me to think of the wonderful movie The Red Violin (1998), which illustrates how a musical instrument can have soul.

It also causes me to think of a certain Robert Greenberg lecture, wherein he describes why Stradivarius instruments are so highly prized. They were made with primeval virgin wood, which is much more dense than second growth or reforested wood. It lends to the instrument sonic qualities that - apparently - cannot be duplicated with modern materials.

Well. Have a great weekend! I plan to repair a cracked plastic hinge on the armrest of my VW and to drive our new Sonata as much as possible.


About Me

My Photo
Go to wesclark.com and follow the links. That'll tell you more than you probably want to know.